Communication Heterogeneity and Collective Consensus in Neural Cellular Automata
📄 arXiv:2606.21202 · 📥 PDF · 2026-06-19 · cond-mat.dis-nn
Authors: Nishit Singh [arXiv · scholar]
🕰 Orloj analysis
Tato práce zkoumá, jak nehomogenní komunikační protokoly ovlivňují dosažení globálního konsensu v systémech s lokálními interakcemi, konkrétně v neuronových celulárních automatech řešících úlohu klasifikace hustoty. Zjišťuje, že „lingvistická vzdálenost“ zpomaluje konsensus a vede k mírné divergenci mezi skupinami, přičemž systémy trénované s různorodými protokoly jsou robustnější.
💡 Práce nabízí zajímavý model pro studium heterogenity komunikace v kolektivní inteligenci, s potenciálními implikacemi pro distribuované systémy a sociální dynamiku, ačkoliv se jedná o aplikaci známých konceptů na specifický problém.
Categories:
THE-20
INF-6
EMG-5
EMG-6
INF-5
✓ falsifiable, limit_reductions, modest_claims
⚠ No explicit mention of error bars/statistical robustness in abstract, No mention of code availability
📄 Abstract
Reaching global agreement from purely local interactions is a defining problem of collective intelligence, and most models of it assume that all agents share a single communication protocol. We ask what happens when they do not. Using a Neural Cellular Automaton in which a population of cells must solve the density classification task, agreeing on a global majority that no individual can observe, we introduce ``languages'' as sub-populations that read one another's messages through a translation with a tunable ``linguistic distance''. We find that linguistic distance slows consensus, that it produces mild divergence between groups rather than full fragmentation, and that a collective whose shared rule was trained under diverse protocols is robust to mismatch; a homogeneously trained one is not. The findings hold on both a ring and a two-dimensional grid, and admit a natural reading as Ising relaxation, in which a foreign-language region acts as a boundary defect that leaves the system in a higher-energy, partially ordered state. These patterns are qualitatively consistent with effects reported in human group studies, suggesting that distance between communication protocols is a minimal mechanism sufficient to produce them, without anything language-specific.