← back

O5 dark-siren forecasts for modified GW propagation: background robustness of the $Ξ$ posterior

📄 arXiv:2607.11144 · 📥 PDF · 2026-07-13 · astro-ph.CO

Authors: Zhaorui Zhang [arXiv · scholar] , Hong-Bo Jin [arXiv · scholar]

🕰 Orloj analysis

7.2
Total score
8.0
Consistency
7.5
Quality
AD relevance

Paper analyzuje robustnost posterioru parametru Ξ (modifikovaná propagace gravitačních vln) pro O5 dark sirens, testujíc vliv variability Ωm. Zjišťuje, že Ξ je robustní vůči změnám Ωm, ale s velkými nejistotami bez měřených rudých posuvů hostitelských galaxií.

💡 Práce poskytuje užitečné prognózy pro budoucí GW experimenty, ale její metodologie je standardní a nepřináší zásadní teoretický průlom.

Categories: MET-1 GRV-4 MET-3 THE-18 COS-1 EXP-1 THE-1

✓ falsifiable, modest_claims, limit_reductions

⚠ missing_code_availability

📄 Abstract

Binary black hole mergers without electromagnetic counterparts are expected to dominate O5 gravitational-wave catalogs. Recent CHIMERA~2.0 forecasts typically fix $Ω_m$ to a CMB-informed value and use spectroscopic hosts when available, but the corresponding sensitivity of the $Ξ$ posterior has not been assessed for pure dark sirens on the public O5 mock catalog. We analyze 300 O5-sensitivity mock events without galaxy catalogs, varying $Ω_m$ over $[0.20,\,0.35]$ (including Planck $0.315$), and compare fixed-background inference with joint $(H_0,\,Ω_m,\,Ξ)$ inference. The marginalized $Ξ$ posterior is $0.9783 \pm 0.3548$ and shows no change across this interval. Only GW luminosity distances enter the analysis, so the likelihood constrains $Ξ\, D_L^{\rm EM}(H_0,\,Ω_m)$; when $Ω_m$ is changed, $H_0$ shifts to compensate and the $Ξ$ marginal remains unchanged. Joint inference gives $Ξ^{\rm joint} = 0.9550 \pm 0.3710$, with $|ρ| \lesssim 0.05$ for the $Ω_m$--$Ξ$ and $H_0$--$Ξ$ pairs, whereas $ρ_{H_0 Ω_m} \simeq -0.4$ and the $H_0$ median moves by $\simeq 4.2\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$ over the adopted $Ω_m$ range. Galaxy-catalog analyses on the same events at fixed $Ω_m = 0.3$ reach $\sim 7.5\%$ precision on $Ξ$, compared with $\pm 36.3\%$ here; the larger uncertainty is driven mainly by missing host redshifts. Sub-percent $Ξ$ tests will therefore still require measured redshifts even if dark sirens dominate the detection rate.

📄 arXiv abstract page 📥 PDF