GW Microlensing: Degeneracy with Unlensed Precessing and Non-Spinning Gravitational-Wave Signals
📄 arXiv:2607.15913 · 📥 PDF · 2026-07-17 · astro-ph.CO
Authors: Disha Hegde [arXiv · scholar] , Anupreeta More [arXiv · scholar]
🕰 Orloj analysis
Tato práce zkoumá degeneraci mezi mikrolensingem gravitačních vln a signály z precesujících či nespinujících zdrojů pomocí konvoluční neuronové sítě. Klasifikátor dosahuje vysoké přesnosti při rozlišování mikrolensovaných a nespinujících signálů, což pomáhá při zpracování dat z detektorů GW.
💡 Práce představuje novou, nízko-latenční metodu strojového učení pro řešení klíčové degenerace v datech gravitačních vln, což má vysokou hodnotu pro budoucí analýzy a odhad parametrů.
Categories:
EXP-5
COS-3
GRV-1
INF-4
EXP-1
GRV-3
INF-5
✓ falsifiable, modest_claims
⚠ Difficulty distinguishing UN from UP signals, Model trained on Gaussian noise generalizes better than on real noise
📄 Abstract
With nearly 400 Gravitational Wave (GW) events detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA network and many more expected, similarities between signals produced by different astrophysical effects can complicate template-based searches and parameter estimation. In particular, GW modulations from spin precession can resemble the beating pattern induced by microlensing from compact objects with masses of $10$-$10^5,M_\odot$. We investigate this degeneracy and assess whether machine learning can distinguish between these effects. We generate 20,000 simulated GW signals for each class with a network optimal signal-to-noise ratio above 20 and train a convolutional neural network on time-frequency (Q-transform) spectrograms. The classifier achieves up to 95% accuracy in Gaussian noise and 82% in real detector noise. We also study classification between microlensed (ML) and unlensed non-spinning (UN) signals, as well as between unlensed non-spinning (UN) and unlensed precessing (UP) signals. While distinguishing UN from UP remains difficult even in Gaussian noise, ML vs. UN classification reaches up to 80% accuracy in real noise. We identify the regions of parameter space where the classifier performs best and evaluate the ML-UN network on real GW events, finding that the model trained on Gaussian noise generalizes better than the one trained on real noise. This work presents the first low-latency machine-learning pipeline for distinguishing microlensed from unlensed non-spinning GW signals.