Hardware Robustness of Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization
📄 arXiv:2607.18196 · 📥 PDF · 2026-07-20 · quant-ph
Authors: Ahatesham Bhuiyan [arXiv · scholar] , Cheng Chu [arXiv · scholar] , Qian Lou [arXiv · scholar] , Mengxin Zheng [arXiv · scholar]
🕰 Orloj analysis
Tento článek systematicky analyzuje robustnost hybridní kvantově-klasické metody Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) na hardwaru IBM Heron. Zkoumá vliv rozpočtu výstřelů, rozložení qubitů, strategií zmírnění šumu a počátečních amplitud CCSD, identifikuje silné stránky a limity SQD pro praktické nasazení.
💡 Práce nabízí cennou empirickou analýzu chování existujícího kvantového algoritmu na reálném hardwaru, což je prakticky relevantní, avšak bez teoretické novosti.
✓ falsifiable, modest_claims
📄 Abstract
Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) is a hybrid quantum-classical method that replaces variational optimization with a self-consistent recovery loop over QPU samples. Although SQD is considered robust to noisy samples and imperfect classical inputs, its robustness across practical deployment choices has not been systematically analyzed. As a result, shot budgets, qubit layouts, noise mitigation strategies, and the coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) amplitudes that initialize the ansatz are often chosen without clear empirical guidance. We analyze SQD robustness on IBM Heron hardware across these dimensions. Structured CCSD-amplitude perturbations, including complete zeroing, produce only modest energy shifts from the clean baseline. Differences across layouts and noise-mitigation settings are large in the first recovery iteration but narrow within a few iterations. Accuracy saturates at moderate shot budgets, while very large budgets slightly worsen recovered energies, likely because working-set selection limits the value of additional samples. These results identify where SQD provides genuine deployment robustness and where its limits remain.