Late-Time Cosmological Tests of a Minisuperspace Generalized-Uncertainty-Principle Deformation
📄 arXiv:2607.25745 · 📥 PDF · 2026-07-28 · gr-qc
Authors: G. G. L. Nashed [arXiv · scholar]
🕰 Orloj analysis
Tento článek zkoumá kvantově-gravitační efekty v kosmologii pomocí deformace FLRW minisuperspace Poissonovy algebry skrze GUP, což modifikuje Friedmannovu rovnici. Model je testován proti pozdně-časovým kosmologickým datům (chronometry, Pantheon+, DESI BAO) a porovnán s ΛCDM a CPL parametrizací, přičemž získává hodnotu pro deformační parametr β*.
💡 Práce aplikuje GUP deformaci na FLRW kosmologii a testuje ji proti aktuálním pozdně-časovým datům, což přináší cenné pozorovací omezení na kvantově-gravitační parametr.
Categories:
QFD-1
GRV-1
EXP-1
THE-1
✓ falsifiable, modest_claims, limit_reductions, error_bars
⚠ Model does not determine a unique perturbation sector, limiting analysis to background observables, Relies on minisuperspace approximation, which is a highly simplified quantum cosmology model
📄 Abstract
The investigation of possible quantum-gravity effects in cosmology is of considerable interest, especially when such effects can be tested against observations of the late-time expansion. In the present work we study a quadratic generalized-uncertainty-principle (GUP) deformation of the FLRW minisuperspace Poisson algebra. At first order in the deformation parameter, the construction modifies the Friedmann equation and hence the homogeneous expansion history. Since it does not determine a unique perturbation sector, we restrict the analysis to background observables, using 31 cosmic-chronometer measurements, the uncalibrated 1580-object Pantheon$+$ Hubble-flow sample, and the 13-component DESI DR2 baryon-acoustic-oscillation likelihood, while treating the sound horizon as a nuisance parameter. We compare the resulting cosmology with flat \LCDM{} and with the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder parametrization. For the baseline normalization we obtain $\betastar=-0.086^{+0.040}_{-0.032}$ at $68\%$ credibility and $-0.142<\betastar<0.005$ at $95\%$ credibility.