Lowering the implementation barrier of neutral-atom quantum computing with agentic workflows
📄 arXiv:2607.25834 · 📥 PDF · 2026-07-28 · quant-ph
Authors: Constantin Dalyac [arXiv · scholar] , Alexandre Dauphin [arXiv · scholar] , Loïc Henriet [arXiv · scholar] , Christophe Jurczak [arXiv · scholar]
🕰 Orloj analysis
Tento článek představuje agentní pracovní postupy pro automatizaci překladu teoretických kvantových protokolů do hardwarových experimentů na neutrálních atomových kvantových procesorech, přičemž zachovává lidskou kontrolu pro kritickou validaci. Demonstruje efektivitu a omezení těchto systémů na případových studiích z mnohačásticové fyziky a optimalizace a analyzuje implementovatelnost velkého korpusu výzkumných prací.
💡 Inovativní přístup k automatizaci kvantového experimentování s lidskou kontrolou výrazně snižuje bariéru vstupu a urychluje výzkum v oblasti kvantových technologií.
Categories:
MET-4
EXP-1
INF-3
MET-1
INF-2
MET-2
INF-1
✓ modest_claims, falsifiable, human_in_the_loop_validation
⚠ Agent's initial failures (inadequate observable, incorrect diagnosis) highlight current limitations of full automation, requiring significant human oversight.
📄 Abstract
Quantum computers are moving from research laboratories to industrial machines accessible via the cloud and integrated into high-performance computing facilities. However, translating theoretical quantum protocols into hardware experiments remains a major bottleneck, requiring expertise across protocol design, compilation, simulation, and cloud execution. Here, we introduce an agentic workflow that automates this pipeline on neutral-atom quantum processors (here two Pasqal QPUs available on the cloud) while keeping the researcher in the loop for critical validation. In three case studies from many-body physics and optimization, the agent went from published paper or patent to a QPU campaign run overnight. In particular, human intervention was crucial to ensure scientific validity: the agent selected an inadequate observable in one experiment and constructed a plausible but incorrect hardware diagnosis in another, with both failures detected only through domain-expert review. Finally, we use a second agent to classify a corpus of 633 Rydberg-array arXiv papers and show that nearly half are implementable on present-day QPUs while identifying specific hardware upgrades needed for the rest. Together, these results demonstrate that agentic workflows provide a practical bridge between theoretical ideas and physical hardware, opening quantum experimentation to a much broader scientific community.