← back

Effective Hamiltonians for Predictive Quantum Control

📄 arXiv:2607.27111 · 📥 PDF · 2026-07-29 · quant-ph

Authors: Razvan Stanescu [arXiv · scholar] , Hugo Ribeiro [arXiv · scholar]

🕰 Orloj analysis

7.8
Total score
8.5
Consistency
7.5
Quality
AD relevance

Paper porovnává efektivitu korekčních pulzů pro kvantové brány v supravodivých transmonách, odvozených ze dvou různých hamiltoniánů (Duffingova aproximace a diagonalizovaná vlastní báze). Ukazuje, že modelové rozdíly ve spektru energie a reprezentaci operátoru pohonu vedou k odlišným predikcím chyb a korekčních pulzů, což ovlivňuje výkon brány.

💡 Práce přináší cenný vhled do kritické závislosti úspěšnosti kvantové kontroly na přesnosti použitého modelu, což je klíčové pro praktickou realizaci kvantových počítačů.

Categories: MET-4 EXP-6 QFD-6 INF-7

✓ modest_claims, falsifiable

📄 Abstract

High-fidelity quantum control relies on accurate models of driven dynamics. We examine this re- quirement for single-qubit gates in superconducting transmons by comparing control pulses derived from the standard Duffing approximation and from a Hamiltonian constructed by diagonalizing the transmon eigenbasis. Using the same correction-pulse construction for both models, we show that correction fields derived from the Duffing approximation can substantially reduce the gate error pre- dicted by that model while remaining less effective when combined with an independently calibrated baseline pulse in the diagonalized-transmon model. In the fast-gate regime, such transferred correc- tions can even fail to improve over the uncorrected diagonalized-transmon baseline. We show that small model-dependent differences in both the energy spectrum and the representation of the drive operator can compound during driven evolution, resulting in different predicted error generators and correction pulses. A mismatch in the accumulated AC Stark phase provides one illustrative di- agnostic of this dynamical model dependence. We further demonstrate that the model Hamiltonian informs the choice of control framework: Omitting relevant leakage pathways or higher-order error channels can lead to an overly restricted correction strategy. Including these channels motivates an extended correction framework that improves the gate performance using the same physical control resources.

📄 arXiv abstract page 📥 PDF