← back

Cosmicflows-4 and the Cosmological Consistency of Large-Scale Motions

πŸ“„ arXiv:2608.14265 Β· πŸ“₯ PDF Β· 2026-08-14 Β· astro-ph.CO

Authors: Adi Nusser [arXiv Β· scholar] , Brent Tully [arXiv Β· scholar]

πŸ“„ Abstract

We study coherent flows in Cosmicflows-4 (CF4) and its constituent catalogs. We fit monopole and dipole moments in nonoverlapping radial bins using a log-distance radial-velocity estimator. For each sample, the Planck 2018 $Ξ›$CDM prediction accounts for the actual positions, statistical weights, velocity covariance, and measurement covariance. Across six bins extending to $300,h^{-1},\mathrm{Mpc}$, the All Individual sample is broadly consistent with $Ξ›$CDM, with dipole and joint deviations of $2.29Οƒ$ and $2.36Οƒ$. The strongest localized feature occurs at $120$--$160,h^{-1},\mathrm{Mpc}$, where $|V_{\rm dip}|=628\pm82,\mathrm{km,s^{-1}}$ and the dipole deviation reaches $3.40Οƒ$. The excess is concentrated toward negative supergalactic X and depends strongly on the survey window. TFR and 6dFGS favor larger dipoles, while SDSS and SN favor smaller ones. Removing 6dFGS reduces the upper-bin dipole deviation to $1.56Οƒ$, while removing SN raises it to $3.77Οƒ$. Nevertheless, the SN and 6dFGS dipoles remain mutually consistent when their covariance is included. SDSS is consistent with $Ξ›$CDM through $160,h^{-1},\mathrm{Mpc}$ but shows a separate rise at larger radii whose significance depends on the treatment of the monopole and shared distance-scale covariance. Overall, CF4 does not show uniformly anomalous motion across its full radial range. Instead, it contains localized and window-dependent features that should be tested with selection-matched mock catalogs and correlated calibration uncertainties.

πŸ“„ arXiv abstract page πŸ“₯ PDF