Constraints on the Modified Emergent Dark Energy Model Using DESI DR2 BAO
π arXiv:2608.24517 Β· π₯ PDF Β· 2026-08-11 Β· physics.gen-ph
Authors: Himanshu Chaudhary [arXiv Β· scholar] , Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi [arXiv Β· scholar] , Salvatore Capozziello [arXiv Β· scholar] , G. Mustafa [arXiv Β· scholar]
π Abstract
In this work, we investigate the modified emergent dark energy (MEDE) model using baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 2 (DESI DR2), together with CMB information from the {\tt LoLLiPoP} (low-$\ell$) and {\tt HiLLiPoP} (high-$\ell$) likelihoods based on the latest Planck NPIPE PR4 release, Planck PR4 lensing, ACT DR6 lensing, and three Type Ia supernova samples (Pantheon$+$, DES-Dovekie, and Union3). We find that the MEDE model remains largely consistent with the standard $Ξ$CDM cosmology. Although small departures from $Ξ$CDM are allowed, the inclusion of SNe~Ia data drives the model parameters toward the standard cosmological scenario, with the parameter $Ξ±$ remaining consistent with $Ξ±=0$ at the $1Ο$ level. The model does not significantly alleviate the $H_0$ or $S_8$ tensions: the inferred $H_0$ values remain below the SH0ES measurement, the sound horizon $r_d$ is nearly unchanged, and the predicted $S_8$ values remain close to those of $Ξ$CDM. The reconstructed cosmological evolution closely follows the $Ξ$CDM prediction, with deviations generally below the $0.5Ο$ level. While the CMB + DESI DR2 dataset favors a full phantom regime, the inclusion of SNe~Ia shifts the evolution toward a full quintessence regime. Finally, although the $ΞΟ^2_{\rm MAP}$ and $Ξ{\rm AIC}$ criteria indicate a marginally better fit than $Ξ$CDM, the logarithmic Bayes factor provides only inconclusive evidence in favor of the MEDE model. Overall, the MEDE model remains compatible with current observations but does not exhibit the phantom-crossing behavior suggested by recent DESI DR2 analyses.