Early against Late: A contrast on dark energy in the light of DESI DR2
π arXiv:2609.05410 Β· π₯ PDF Β· 2026-09-04 Β· astro-ph.CO
Authors: Miguel A. Zapata [arXiv Β· scholar] , Karim Carrion [arXiv Β· scholar] , Gabriela Garcia-Arroyo [arXiv Β· scholar]
π Abstract
Recent findings from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements, combined with Type Ia supernovae and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, suggest potential parameter-level deviations from $Ξ\text{CDM}$. However, parameter exclusions omit prior-volume penalties, whereas Bayesian evidence uncovers a stark dichotomy between early- and late-time dynamics. To quantify this effect, we perform a Bayesian model comparison that explicitly accounts for the cosmological epoch of dark energy dynamics, contrasting two schemes acting in opposite epochs of cosmic history: pre-recombination Early Dark Energy (EDE) and late-time Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL), both measured against a baseline $Ξ$CDM. We validate the learned harmonic-mean estimator against \texttt{UltraNest} (at background level) before applying it to the CMB analysis. Background-only data already disfavor both extensions, yielding $\ln B_{Ξ\text{CDM},\text{EDE}} = 2.45 \pm 0.25$ and $\ln B_{Ξ\text{CDM},\text{CPL}} = 3.45 \pm 0.24$. Including CMB sharpens this result: EDE is decisively rejected ($\ln B_{Ξ\text{CDM},\text{EDE}} = 12.44 \pm 0.05$) with its early-time fraction constrained to $10^3\,Ξ©_e^{\rm EDE} = 2.0^{+0.6}_{-1.0}$, whereas CPL remains moderately disfavored ($\ln B_{Ξ\text{CDM},\text{CPL}} = 2.33 \pm 0.06$), even though 2D parameter posteriors for both models display a multi-$Ο$ deviation from $Ξ\text{CDM}$. Thus, Bayesian evidence weakens reported preferences for dark energy dynamics, with the impact depending on the cosmic epoch involved, confirmed by our functional reconstructions of $w_{\rm de}(z)$ and $Ξ©_{\rm de}(z)$ from posterior samples.