LISA bright sirens as a tiebreaker among cosmologies in tension
π arXiv:2609.35317 Β· π₯ PDF Β· 2026-09-28 Β· astro-ph.CO
Authors: M. F. A. Medeiros [arXiv Β· scholar] , F. C. Carvalho [arXiv Β· scholar] , L. L. Sales [arXiv Β· scholar]
π Abstract
Gravitational waves from massive black hole binaries detected by LISA will deliver luminosity distances without any astrophysical calibration, offering a probe of the expansion history independent of the cosmic distance ladder. Rather than asking how tightly LISA will constrain a single fiducial cosmology, we ask which of several mutually discrepant present-day cosmologies a future LISA dataset would render most self-consistent. We build mock catalogues of LISA bright sirens under three fiducial cosmologies drawn from datasets that participate in the current $H_0$ discrepancy (Planck 2018, Union3 and Pantheon+SH0ES), with a self-consistent error budget from instrumental noise, weak lensing and host peculiar velocities. We compare the posterior from the simulated LISA data alone with that of a real-data combination of Type Ia supernovae, DESI baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic chronometers and the compressed Planck 2018 CMB, and quantify their internal tension in the $(H_0,Ξ©_m)$ plane, crossing each fiducial with three SN Ia compilations. The fiducial drives the tension, from $2.08Ο$ to well beyond $5Ο$, while the supernova compilation changes it by at most $1.2Ο$. The discriminating power is strongly asymmetric: a Pantheon+SH0ES universe is inconsistent with every background we test, at a significance far in excess of $5Ο$ and still at $3$-$5Ο$ for the $10$-$20$ events expected from recent population models, whereas the Planck 2018 and Union3 fiducials, which differ by only $0.24$ km/s/Mpc in $H_0$, cannot be separated by any catalogue size. LISA bright sirens are therefore a sharp arbiter of the Cepheid-calibrated scenario and, on this error budget, silent between the other two.